data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/27ecb/27ecb8393b2593f01d2a605dd94e4213d4a7f9e4" alt=""
"This ruling "surely has an impact on the ecommerce industry", said Sajai Singh, Partner at J. Sagar Associates. "Websites will be required to remove objectionable content if any user complains."
Google and Facebook are among 21 internet companies that have been accused of hosting material that may cause civil unrest and had been given until 6 February to remove all 'anti-social' and 'anti-religious' content on their sites.
"Both Google and Facebook hold a global policy of non-interference," said Singh. "But the companies have been warned that this will not work in India so have been asked to develop a mechanism to block objectionable material."
However, the Information Technology Rules - enacted by the Department of Information Technology in 2011 to regulate e-content in India - notes "that intermediaries are liable only if they are aware that such content has been stored on their computer system and they have not taken any action to remove such material", said Singh. "Nowhere the Rules stipulate any screening of information."
Singh also thinks that "with the current order one would tend to believe that Facebook and Google may adopt some electronic mode of screening". However, experts have expressed serious doubts with regard to the success of such a screening. Singh: "Whether there will be stringent requirement of screening will depend on the final order of the Delhi High Court."
Michiel Willems © 2012 CP Publishing Ltd. London, UK. Top picture: Cia.gov